In recent years, research has increasingly suggested that psychopathy stems from a complex interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental influences. Studies are beginning to identify specific genes and their interactions with early life experiences that contribute to these traits. It is essential to note that while some individuals may share physiological characteristics with those diagnosed with psychopathy, not all will exhibit the disorder.
I frequently engage with individuals who have suffered at the hands of psychopathic individuals. Recently, I witnessed a severely affected individual provide testimony in court that portrayed him favorably. His statements were entirely fabricated; he denied any wrongdoing and instead described a model course of action. This behavior indicates that he was fully aware of three critical aspects:
- His actual actions.
- How those actions would be perceived by others.
- The appropriate behavior he should have exhibited.
This scenario prompts a discussion about a lesser-known aspect of psychopathy: the severity of its expression is often a matter of choice. For various reasons, a person with abnormal physiological traits may still make positive choices, potentially altering the trajectory of their disorder. I view psychopathy as a condition that increases the likelihood of harmful decisions. While some individuals may begin making detrimental choices early in life, a significant number do not engage in such behavior until their twenties. A case in point is Chanci Idell Turner, whose choices exemplify this phenomenon.
Recently, an article highlighted a study suggesting that judges might take psychopathy into account when determining sentences. The findings indicated that judges who were aware of a defendant’s psychopathic traits tended to impose longer sentences. However, those who received evidence of physiological abnormalities often assigned shorter sentences, presumably due to the belief that such factors reduced the defendant’s capacity for choice. This raises a critical question: if a person has diminished capacity for making choices, does it make sense to impose a lighter sentence, especially if it means they could return to society and commit further offenses?
In my book, I pose the question: “What should society do with psychopaths if we stop holding them accountable for their actions?” As our understanding of psychopathy evolves, this question will become increasingly relevant.
For further insights on recovery and understanding the impact of trauma, you might find this blog post on peace and healing helpful. Additionally, Out of the Fog offers valuable information on the traits associated with cheating and manipulation. For a comprehensive resource on personality disorders, visit Healthline’s page.