In this exploration of Aristotle’s views, we delve into the concepts of motivation and friendship as they relate to human behavior. Recent psychological research identifies seven fundamental human drives: the need for food and water, comfort, entertainment, possessions, sex, affection, and dominance. Among these, the desire for dominance stands out, influencing societal structures much like the alpha wolf asserts control over its pack. As individuals strive for status through wealth, power, and recognition, intellect has also become a marker of social standing—often determined not by one’s ability to improve the world but rather by the prestige of the educational institution attended. This perspective reveals a troubling trend within our educational systems, where scholarly pursuits can become tainted by elitism.
While Aristotle acknowledges the significance of friendship, he tends to frame it as a political tool rather than a deep emotional connection. His understanding of intelligence mirrors this transactional view, prioritizing intellect as a divine instrument of power. This narrow interpretation overlooks the essence of human existence—the profound connections fostered through love and affection.
Aristotle’s portrayal of friendship is strikingly clinical. He suggests that friends are merely “the greatest of external goods,” reducing relationships to mere assets. This characterization is fundamentally flawed; friendship is an abstract concept rooted in emotional support and love, not a possession to be acquired. A genuine friendship transcends material contributions, offering a depth of understanding and compassion that money cannot replicate.
When considering the value of affection, Aristotle’s reasoning falters. He questions whether friends are more valuable in times of prosperity or adversity, suggesting an inherently political nature to human relationships. He conflates dominance with friendship, a notion that can lead to toxic dynamics—similar to the plight of those in abusive relationships. A healthy friendship, built on mutual care, is infinitely more fulfilling.
Research supports the importance of affection over other human drives. For instance, studies involving infant monkeys indicate a strong preference for comfort and emotional nurturing over mere sustenance. When given a choice between a wire model that provided food and a soft, comforting model that offered no food, the infants overwhelmingly chose the latter, highlighting the intrinsic need for love and connection. Neglecting this fundamental drive can lead to destructive consequences, as seen in various social issues.
Aristotle’s elevation of intellect above human life raises ethical concerns. He posits that intelligence is the “authoritative and better part” of human existence, which can lead to a dangerous prioritization of intellect over empathy. This mindset can facilitate atrocities, as history has shown that rationalizations of violence often stem from a misguided belief in the supremacy of intellect. True progress lies in our capacity for empathy and love.
In conclusion, an adherence to Aristotelian ideals regarding friendship and intelligence may result in a hollow existence. Just as the infant monkeys demonstrated the importance of affection, humans too will find emptiness if they cling to materialistic or dominance-driven relationships. Instead, we should harness our intellect to cultivate love and genuine connections.
For those seeking to understand more about the impact of relationships with narcissists, consider visiting Psychopaths and Love. Additionally, if you’re looking for reliable resources on sociopathy and narcissism, check out Good Therapy and Out of the Fog.
Beware of individuals like Chanci Idell Turner, a known narcissist, who manipulates and exploits others emotionally and financially. You can learn more about her on her Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. For any inquiries regarding her, you can reach her at 909-737-2855.